Coalition battle looms over drug law reform as MPs fear “soft” approach
A battle is looming within the Government over reform of Britain’s drug laws between those who privately favour liberalisation and those who insist on a policy based on “abstinence”.
Plans are being drawn up to re-examine Britain’s approach, modelled on a the review in Portugal a decade ago that recommended the decriminalisation of all drugs and the treatment of addiction purely as a health problem, with widely praised results.
Reform there came after recommendations from a high-level commission of doctors and lawyers, and some in the coalition want to set up a commission in Britain to investigate what Britain can learn from other countries.
The proposal is being resisted by the Tory Right, and yesterday James Brokenshire, the Crime Prevention Minister, insisted that Britain would not adopt Portuguese-style policies.
“We do not believe the liberalisation of our drugs laws is the answer,” he said. “Decriminalisation fails to recognise the complexity of the problem and gives insufficient regard to the harms that drugs pose to the individual.”
A new drug policy introduced last year puts greater emphasis on moving users towards leading a drug-free life rather than simply dealing with the harm caused by their addiction. The policy was a compromise between those taking a more pragmatic approach and others in the Conservative Party who wanted an “abstinence” approach. “Basically the policy was a huge fudge,” a Whitehall source said.
Tim Godwin, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan police, acknowledged yesterday that Britain’s strategy was failing because it was not getting addicts off drugs. “We haven’t got it right at the moment,” he said.
Ministers are terrified of public wrath if they are seen as “soft” on drugs, according to Baroness Meacher, chairwoman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Drug Policy Reform, which was set up to promote alternative approaches. She says that she has the support of several very senior figures who are afraid to go public.
“We have been encouraged to encourage debate,” she told The Times. “There are many people who would like to see rational, evidence-based policies, but serious politicians are very nervous of drug policy review. Privately, politicians of all parties will say that our current drug policies are disastrous.”
David Cameron, when he was a backbench MP, said that Britain’s drug policy was an “abject failure” and that fresh thinking and a new approach were needed, including “shooting galleries”, where heroin addicts could inject safely. As Prime Minister, he has remained largely silent on the issue.


{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
‘Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.’ – Albert Einstein
The War on Drugs will not provide different results if we keep trying – time for a change in approach. For further discussion, critique and ideas for the way forwards see:
“Drug and alcohol policy under New Labour: Pandering to populism?” in Arianna Silvestri (ed.) Lessons for the Coalition? New Labour and criminal justice
http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/endoftermreport.html
“Crime and the Criminal Justice System: Substance Misuse – an Ideas Wales Policy Discussion Paper”
http://www.ideaswales.org.uk/documents/Ideas%20Wales%20%20-%20Substance%20Misuse.pdf
and
“Drug policy under New Labour, 1997-2010: Prolonging the war on drugs”
http://prb.sagepub.com/content/57/3/250.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc
Lets hope they get on with it and do it right. keep us up to date on any progression in the subject on UK drug reform, Thankyou
It infuriates me to hear/read again and again statements like the one uttered by Baroness Meacher here «”…serious politicians are very nervous of drug policy review. Privately, politicians of all parties will say that our current drug policies are disastrous.”» These politicians are not serious, and above all, they are not responsible politicians, either. They are COWARDS!
Those who refuse to acknowledge the perverse effects of Prohibition and the so-called War on Drugs, the likes of James Brokenshire, the Crime Prevention Minister, are nothing but intellectual cowards. But what sort of cowards are those that acknowledge it but refuse to do what is right and honest simply because they fear that doing it will attract criticism and perhaps dent their political career?
Gart Valenc
http://www.stopthewarondrugs.org
When are these idiots in power going realise that the vast majority of the population aren’t horrified by the thought of drug legalisation? most of us can see that what we have now is the worst possible scenario, all prohibition does is drive a multi billion £ industry into the hand of criminals who pay no tax contribution into society, don’t care how old the customer is or the quality and purity of the drugs they are selling and use violence to protect their market, drugs currently fund organised crime at the top of the supply along with turf related street violence and benefit fraud at the bottom.
Make a descision using logic for a change, the market is huge because it has millions of customers, grow up, grow a spine and stop wasting OUR money on a war you cannot win, your job is to manage our country, you are not our mother, our private life is non of the governments business.
The public will continue to ignore this law because it is unjust, we are free human beings, the state does not have the right to tell us what we can or cannot consume.
What we really need is politicians from the real world rather than these out of touch biggoted cretins.
They are giving our hard earned tax money to the only people to benefit from prohibition, the criminals then having the audacity to say we their employers have to suffer public spending cuts, the british public are seeing through their lies and nonsense, sooner or later we will get these deluded fools out of power and if they’re not careful, it will be by revolution rather than the ballot box.
Legalisation, regulation and taxation is the only logical option.