www.reformdrugpolicy.com (Launched 16/11/11)
Objectives
Time for ChangeThe War on Drugs has failed Despite governments spending globally in excess of $100 billion a year on fighting the War on Drugs, there has been a clear long-term pattern of increasing availability and use. The unintended consequences of the current policies include ever-growing health problems and soaring levels of crime, violence and corruption throughout the world, together with discrimination and widespread abuses of human rights. The illicit drug trade is now the third most valuable industry in the world, estimated to be worth $450 billion per year, all in the hands of criminals. Improving our drug policy is one of the key policy challenges of our time. Let us break the taboo on debate and reform. The time for action is now. Informing the PublicThe Beckley Foundation is co-coordinating a global media campaign to inform both politicians and the public about the failings of the current system of criminalisation and the potential benefits of an evidence-based, health-orientated approach to drug policy. To augment this campaign, the Beckley Foundation will be conducting polls and a public petition to gauge public opinions on drug policy issues. |
The Launch of the InitiativeThe Global Initiative for Drug Policy Reform, launched at the House of Lords on November 17, with a Meeting co-hosted by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Drug Policy Reform and the Beckley Foundation, will promote health-oriented, cost-effective policies based on scientific evidence and human rights. It will also open the discussion on how to reform the UN Drug Conventions, which currently restrict the options open to any country for drug policy reform. At the Meeting, there will be evidence presented by:
The Beckley Foundation has commissioned the following Reports, also to be discussed at the Meeting: Beckley Foundation Reports
This is the first-ever analysis of its kind, and will provide valuable economic data. It has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Pudney and his team.
This ground-breaking report, authored by Professor Robin Room and Sarah Mackay, is the first to carefully document the ways in which the UN Conventions can be amended in order to allow signatory countries the freedom to choose and experiment with domestic policies best suited to their special needs. These include two main options: 1) to clearly decriminalise the use and possession of small amounts of controlled drugs for personal consumption; 2) to tax and regulate the domestic market in one or more substances, e.g. coca leaf or cannabis. |
Global Initiative Documents:
GLOBAL INITIATIVE MEDIA COVERAGE:
Colombian president calls for global rethink on drugs
Britain should talk about legalising drugs, says Colombia president (whose country produces around 80% of world’s cocaine)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061007/Colombia-president-Juan-Manuel-Santos-wants-rethink-Britains-cocaine-marijuana-ban.html
The war on drugs and the shameful silence of our politicians
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/13/drugs-cameron









{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
I would like to stay informed about this initiative. I plan to also do my part and spread awareness.
Not sure how I can help, but you have my support.
I would like to get to know what I could do to help reforming our nations drug policy
Its about time that someone tried to change drug policies. The punishments for many drugs are completely inappropriate to the use/amount of harm possible done by the drug. Finally a wide spread movement that may change the way the world thinks about drugs.
I’m interested in promoting this….what can i do to help?
I support this initiative wholeheartedly but am dismayed to still see various errors of law and language. I have made these points for some years as indeed has the creator of this critique, Casey Hardison. Perhaps the most important thing is to remember that the primary law hands powers to government to administer it rationally. Indeed the Misuse of Drugs Act is so flexible and indeed rational that it does not need to be changed at all in order to realise all the necessary regulatory instruments to achieve the purpose of maximal harm reduction to society caused by drug misuse. This is not a question of government following the law, but of misunderstanding it and failing in their [legal]responsibilities.
It is absolutely vital to recognise that the law regulates persons, not drugs! There is no war on drugs, it is a war on people, there are no illegal or illicit drugs, only persons criminalised for their activities irrespective of whether those are harmful or not, there are no legal drugs, only persons ignored by a policy that has not basis in law. Further, drug use as you claim to be illegal, is not. Parliament drafted the law so that problematic use that leads to a social problem could be regulated through the control of drug property interests, the significant point is that the Act is revealed to be a regulatory instrument. The sections on the ACMD also reveal this when one reads what suggestions they may make re making arrangements for the supervision of the supply of controlled drugs.
“Not sure how I can help, but you have my support.”
+1
As a 37 year old with an adequate inteligence is it not within my decision to which way i chose to relax on my free time. i tried drinking alcahol and didnt agree with the way it made me feel, then i found cannabis which gave me the same type of release a lot of non law -breakers get from alcohol. anyone who has tried both will agree you feel more in control with cannabis rather that alcohol. why because i use cannabis respectfully am i treated with the same contempt as criminals for other crimes.
Calum, sorry for the late reply, if you want to get involved send us an email beckley@beckleyfoundation.org) with your CV and what you can see yourself doing for us. Your marketing experience could come in use for our Global Initiative promotion campaign.
James
Have you considered including more business perspective into your reform group? You’re talking about reforming a big commodity market after all, any succesful attempt of reforming the market would need a lot of market research about the motivations and needs of the drug consumers.
The health and human rights approach is good but there also needs to be understanding of the capital involved in the market and to capture the market from the criminals you’ll need to provide a more desirable product with adequate consumer protection.
The reasonable thing would be to integrate all psychoactives such as alcohol and tobacco too into a single market since they all share the demand pool for mind alteration, even though they are legally separated. This could offset the health/crime costs occurring from alcohol, tobacco etc. use by providing competing products. But that is the problem, because legal psychoactive substance businesses will have every incentive to prevent competition and to keep their monopoly status so where do you think you’ll get the economic/political capital to match theirs?
If you want to get things done in the world you need to concentrate on how much capital there is to be gained. You can’t treat drugs just as an issue of the health sector, drug users can’t be just patients to cure but more importantly as consumers whose needs have to be adressed.
So I suggest a lot of market/marketing research. Of course the drugs market should be a state controlled one where the responsibility is to taxpayers instead of stockholders but business is still business and any plan for reforming the drugs market will have to be able to compete with the stakeholders in the current market.
You are correct to suggest that the business perspective is an important one, especially in these financially oriented times. The Beckley Foundation are currently funding a cost benefit analysis being undertaken by Prof Stephen Pudney from the Institute of Social and Economic Research. This work will definitely include an analysis of potential profits made from regulation and costs offset by decriminalization. We hope this will be ready in time for our full launch of the global initiative.
Please share the various steps taking to achieve the feat in Greece. The learning will be used in some developing countries.
Cannabis Law Reform (CLEAR) is announcing a detailed analysis of a regulated cannabis market in Britain on 14th September 2011. We have commissioned a study of the financial implications from the Independent Drug Monitoring Unit (IDMU) and spent many months developing our proposals.
I hope that we can work together to advance a common sense approach that will minimise all health and social harms as well as enabling the people of Britain to enjoy the tremendous benefits that cannabis offers.
You have my support. For the communication
I add my support for this intiative.
I’m minded to make a point of noting Darryl Bicklers comment. I would like to ask Darryl, “has our governments been mis-interpretating the Mis-Use of Drugs act 1971 over the past centuries?”
As for the present system the offence & punishment certainly outweighs and are more harmful than the drugs themselves. I.H